A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving future neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal web page inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted countrywide focus adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family members house at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times report about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction will work at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, seek to make their relatives home. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming created by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted underneath planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both citizens of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing authorization by building a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such spots are matter to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partly designed, is in the right placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their check out, an allegation which has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, the place views of the sea are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, Based on sworn proof referenced within the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances, an image that has due to the fact come to be emblematic from the intensity in the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence from the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Occasions documented, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned One of the more putting descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions were cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail with the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to further submissions on no matter whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the legal timeline.
At the Main from the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as constructed, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've described their extensive-standing connection to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children house in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been involved with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly different Specialist backgrounds can find themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are becoming synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality of your coastline as well as the symbolic character of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an excessive method.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome stays unsure. The court ought to establish whether or not the wall as developed complies with organizing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Specific Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and preparing situations. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who ought to Reside alongside one another prolonged after the legal fees are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the situation prolong over and above that tackle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic issues for instance environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. No matter whether it will ultimately be altered, taken out, or accomplished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s findings. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin lately.